Pretentious Yet Pointless | |
| Artist: | Aris, Sol |
| Medium: | Acrylics on virtual canvas |
| Title: | Randomly generated image 1134633899 |
| Date: | Sun Nov 15 18:57:19 UTC 2026 |
| Description: |
Such forms, quietly formal, create a strong interaction of forces.
The
decorated
background
belies
not completely abstract.
It is important to understand that the
idea behind stereometric construction
is that it encourages the artist
to understand form in terms of
area,
rather than mass.
In this image Sol Aris
shows
the relationship between
salt and pepper.
Sol Aris has not completed the
meaning
of this painting.
The artist avoids
traditional proportions
to contain the
colours, which can by this means
float free.
The artist employs
traditional proportions
to contain the
colours, which thus
float free.
The spectator is drawn by the
essential identity
of the work into
the world of single-axis asymmetric soft,
closed signs with inner and outer crossings.
A constantly
evolving
glammerdummering,
the relationship of the spectator
of which
is always constant,
is always transformed
by the understanding
of the onlooker.
This striking piece is
representative of
one of the central preoccupations of Sol Aris's art,
the perception of the
shapes
where the extraordinarily refined aesthetic sensibility to the piece
is
a reflection of the artist's soul.
It is important to understand that the
idea behind abstract art
is that it encourages the viewer
to understand the composition in terms of
dimensionality,
rather than odour.
Unexpectedly,
we see the
diagonal axis
representing
the inner ego
undulate towards the centre of the image,
suggesting
unreliability.
The never-ending curves are intertwined in a parody of misery. Sol Aris has not completed the individuality of this sculpture. The here and now experience of sugar and wine of Sol Aris's earlier works are clearly visible here, but transformed. The spectator is drawn by the relationship of the viewer of the doodle into the world of similarity of the senses of smell and touch. Contrasts of sugar and wine march across the foreground of the prototype. The decorated canvas enriches not completely concrete. The artist employs a rectangular grid to contain the colours, which thus stand alone. A particularly contentious aspect of this particular work is that it is a reflection of the artist's soul. The viewer is drawn by the scale and openness of the painting into the world of single-axis asymmetric soft, closed signs with inner and outer crossings. The decorated canvas belies a reflection of the artist's soul. It is important to understand that the idea behind the Suprematist school is that it enables the viewer to understand the composition in terms of dimensionality, rather than weight. In surrealism, the visual phenomena of the physical world are, in themselves, meaningless: the only worthy thing is feeling, as such. The essence of neo-impressionism is that it encourages Sol Aris to define the composition in terms of area, rather than mass. The never-ending curves are intertwined in a parody of Shaker æsthetics. Such forms, delicately variegated, create disarmingly strong sensations. Contrasts of the senses of sight and taste dominate the foreground of this image. A temporally changing glammerdummering, the essential identity of which never changes, is sometimes unrecognizably altered by the essential fact of the reviewer. The image shares not only Sol Aris's death-identification but also his cosmic perspective and obsession with power. A constantly changing glammerdummering, the extraordinarily refined aesthetic sensibility of which remains unchanged, is sometimes irrefutably altered by the mere presence of the viewer. In Shaker æsthetics, the visual phenomena of the external world are, in themselves, empty: the important thing is feeling, as such. Such forms, both serene and poetic, create strong gestalt sensations. ``This art, facing forwards and inwards, is of images of expectation and spiritual progress that are freighted with no historical context at all and which owe little to the appearance of observed reality.'' [Brian Keeble, on Cecil Collins, Temeno 11, London, 1990, p.114] |
| next work |